Multiculturalism in Human Resource Management Essay

Multiculturalism in Human Resource Management - Essay ExampleI believe that the nitty-gritty of regeneration, cultural or differentwise, is the co-existence of different attributes within a single social environment. For instance, if there argon different cultures involved, but each culture is encountered within the scene of its own social milieu, then there is multiculturalism but no mixed bag, because the employees are not members of a minority culture subjected to a paramount culture. On the other hand, if the variety of cultures were encountered within the United States, then one might say that cultural diversity existed. The essence of diversity is pluralism within a single context, diversity in the creation of a common society (McGraw & Formicola, 2005, p. 14). Therefore, if the multiculturalism involved a multinational hiring individuals of different races or cultures in different overseas subsidiaries only because a particular race or culture is prevalent in that partic ular host country, then diversity did not exist as plurality because the cultures were dominant in their own locales. The answer to the third question affirms that diversity and inclusion are important in the business environment, but is not clear on why diversity is important. The example given is that diversity draws world customers closer to the organization rather than alienates them. However, culture-sensitive marketing strategy changes consumer perception of the firm, without necessarily transforming the parent wad into a diverse and inclusive entity (Van Mesdag, 1999). A devolved management approach that employs cultural adaptation in its marketing efforts does not necessarily result in a diverse work force, although a diverse work force may draw customers of different attributes and backgrounds, within the parent companys environment, closer to it. reply for the post of Student 2 (Brandon Burton) The post points out an important challenge to diversity, that is, how the ide als and theoretical principles of diversity are actualized so that one may say, Our corporation has achieved diversity. The difficulty in arriving at a cogent description of diversity is underscored by Brandons questions Is it hiring more minorities? Is it seeking minorities who think differently? While these ambiguities are well illustrated, there appears to be some thing missing in the definition that is arrived at. Diversity in this post is defined in terms of possessing different ideas, personal as well as business experiences, and culture (in what sense is uncertain culture related to nationality or ethnicity, or culture related to personal upbringing and orientation?). It appears that this definition defeats the concept behind diversity and inclusion because it ignores the sense behind inclusion. It is generally accepted that Inclusion means inviting those who have been historically locked out to eff in. (Asante, n.d.). The post is correct in stressing that the person with the right qualifications must be hired, but the implicit premise here is that diversity will shackle the business to hire one who is not qualified. Diversity and inclusion are specific in that they are initiatives which aim to set straight the historical prejudices that relegated large number of certain races, creeds, cultures, and other attributes to cycles of poverty and exclusion. Diversity is a moral imperative to ensure justice and fair treatment of all members of societyThe comprehensive proactive organization focuses not only on the business case for diversity, but also actively on the social justice case and what is the right thing to do